Post 2025 market design for the NEM

Publication date:
11 October 2019
Resource type:
Submission

PIAC responded to the Energy Security Board’s (ESB) Post 2025 Market Design Issues Paper.

We consider fundamental change to energy markets and the planning and operation of the energy system is required to ensure energy supply remains reliable, becomes affordable, and there is steady emissions reductions.

We support the ESB’s proposed key principles for the post 2025 design of the NEM, with some modifications, particularly with respect to cost allocation.

We suggest replacing this ‘responder-pays’ cost principle with the more efficient and fairer ‘beneficiary-pays’ principle, so that ‘costs are allocated those who benefit from a given investment or action’.

We consider the ‘transparency and simplicity’ principle should be separated into two principles. Simplicity should be optional and subordinate to principles that promote efficiency and fairness. Transparency should not be optional.

We recommend scenarios used for forecasting should reflect the range of plausible futures and future pricing arrangements should be adaptable to changing and unpredictable conditions and needs.

We make a range of recommendations concerning future market design options and market price settings. 

Share this article

Wins

HPLS and StreetCare have influenced a City of Sydney proposal to reduce the number of places where alcohol is prohibited.
Towards Truth is a partnership between PIAC and UNSW Indigenous Law Centre.
Former disability discrimination commissioner Graeme Innes settled a dispute over a 'humiliating and distressing' experience.

Keep up to date with our work

Subscribe for updates including media coverage, event invitations and progress stories. You will hear from us about twice a month.